05 November 2015


A borrower sought a last minute stay of eviction.

The court refused because the basis was not a firm proposal made by the borrower that had been accepted by the bank but simply that further negotiations could result in the bank accepting an amount (yet to be identified) and agreeing to a stay. The court noted that there was no evidence that the borrower was in a position to pay any agreed amount to the bank and had already failed to pay an amount previously agreed.

Click here to read the full judgement

LesawebLesa Bransgrove holds a Bachelor of Laws and Bachelor of Commerce from the University of Queensland and a Master of Laws from the University of London. Lesa was admitted as a solicitor of the Queensland Supreme Court in 1996 and the UK Supreme Court in 2002 and as a barrister of the NSW Bar in 2009. After working on the Lehman's litigation Lesa left the bar and joined Bransgroves.

Read more about Lesa Bransgrove